At
this point, it’s clear to many that the mass media has largely sold out
America and that most of the journalists we trust to “report the truth”
instead are promoting whatever management tells them will benefit their
corporate sponsors. However, while this is the case, many journalists
don’t like it, and only did so because they felt they had no other
option.
However, because of how much interest there is in
genuine media (e.g., the grass roots support Substack has received has
allowed many like myself to devote a lot of time to writing here) and
the fact that the mainstream media is taking in less and less money (which is leading to many journalists getting laid off), many journalists who previously worked in the mainstream media are now jumping ship to join the alternative media.
John Davidson
is one such example (e.g., he used to be a journalist and video editor
for CNN and then worked as a producer and director for many of the other
major networks), but during COVID, realized he had to speak out about
what was happening and began covering what had happened to the vaccine
injured. In turn, he decided that he needed to take on the task on one
else had—producing a professional quality documentary about the
corruption which gave rise to the disaster we saw throughout COVID-19.
Note:
in my eyes, one of the largest things which has made it possible to
overturn the insurmountable monster the medical-industrial-complex
created for COVID was a grass roots network of citizen journalists who
took up the call to speak out and the fact that this community was very
supportive of anyone who was trying to do good work regardless of their
background. For example, in my case, despite being a nobody and
anonymous, the largest people on here felt I was doing something important and promoted me,
giving me a platform I never imagined I would have (the content I
produce now receives millions of views each month). For this reason, I
try to pay that forward and promote other people who I feel are in the
same situation I was in two years ago.
As John
Davidson was one of the main journalists who exposed what that shady
network of online healthcare influencers, I reached out to him when I
produced that story and he in turn, was immensely helpful. In return,
he asked me to watch his documentary and consider promoting it.
Since I got a good feel about his heart and character (e.g., in regard to the spiritual qualities I discussed at the end of this article),
I honored his request. In turn, after I watched his documentary, I
recognized that it was a critical media production for our movement.
This was because it effectively breaks down the scam which was pulled
upon us in a way that can reach and persuade people who have doubts
about what happened but don’t have the background people who have been
studied this issue for years do.
The primary purpose of this article is to have you watch the documentary, so when you have time, please consider doing so.
Note: the imbedded video can be viewed on Youtube here. If it gets pulled (which happens a lot with Youtube), it can also be viewed on Rumble here.
In a recent article,
I tried to explain one of the curious conundrums about COVID-19—while
the disease was somewhat novel, it was not that hard to treat and dozens
of effective treatments for it were quickly discovered (best
demonstrated by the fact many third world countries with minimal funding
for their medical systems were able to effectively address the disease
and had a relatively small death rate). Yet, in all the richer
countries, it was viewed as “untreatable” and those who went to the
hospital with a severe case of typically died.
In
turn, a curious paradigm emerged, the more countries did what the best
“experts” (e.g., the WHO) told them to do—the more people died. Even
more remarkably, those “biodefense” experts had received billions each year for decades
to conduct a variety of risky experiments (e.g., the gain of function
ones which created COVID-19) under the logic all that research would
prevent a disastrous pandemic and hence was necessary.
It’s
pretty hard to justify a track record like that (especially given how
poorly they performed during COVID-19), and it has led to many (myself
included) concluding this whole thing was a racket which only cares
about justifying its existence (e.g., through more disastrous pandemics
occurring) and hence is unlikely to ever actually solve the problem it’s
tasked with (as doing so would put them out of business).
Note:
because of the widespread public outcry towards these tactics, the WHO
has moved to have a global treaty (which supersedes national law) be
enshrined across the world that forces everyone to do what was done
during COVID (e.g., continuing risky bioweapons research or creating
liability-free “emergency” pharmaceuticals and mandating them). That
treaty will soon be voted upon by the WHO, so like many I have been
trying to bring attention to it so that it can be overturned (which is
discussed in more detail here).
So,
during COVID-19, we saw a ghastly playbook be utilized—every safe and
effective treatment was attacked and blocked from entering the market,
while a variety of dangerous and ineffective treatments were pushed onto
it, all of which proved to be ineffective enough that it justified
mandating an experimental vaccination upon the world (as there was no
other “treatment” for COVID-19).
Note: the one effective
experimental (and lucrative) treatment that was brought to the market
were the SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies, and unlike the rest of the
proprietary treatments, these were then blocked from getting to many of
the Americans who needed them.
Sadly, this was the exact same playbook which was used during the AIDS crisis in the 1980s,
so many of us were able to correctly predict exactly how this would
play out (especially since many of the key figures in the COVID-19
response like Anthony Fauci were directly responsible for what happened with HIV and predictably did the exact same thing this time around).
So,
from very the start of COVID-19, like many, I worked to find an
effective treatment for in as I knew without one a variety of disastrous
treatments would be pushed onto the market. In turn, like many, I ran
into a series of absurd roadblocks from the FDA which prevented things
we knew could treat COVID-19 from going anywhere.
Fortunately,
other researchers around the world made an important
discovery—hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, two widely available,
affordable, and highly regarded drugs (due to their decades of proven
safety and efficacy) effectively treated COVID-19. Even more
remarkably, one of these drugs (hydroxychloroquine) had already been identified as a promising SARS treatment by the biodefense industry.
Note:
nitazoxanide was also identified as a promising SARS treatment and also
effectively treated COVID-19, but it never caught as much attention
(which I suspect was since its generic formulation cost significantly
more than the other two).
Yet, rather than promote these
drugs, the federal bureaucracy, the mass media and the academic press
relentlessly attacked anyone who proposed using them, leading to a
situation where many doctors were forced to do it discretely and
constantly be at risk of losing their medical license (which quite a few
did) for providing that lifesaving care.
On the surface,
the fact that something like that could happen in America seems
preposterous, but as we all saw over the last few years, it did.
Davidson’s documentary in turn breaks down exactly what happened with
one of those drugs (hydroxychloroquine) and the degree to which so many
public officials lied through their teeth to keep it off the market—to
the point they were even able to override the Trump administration
trying to get it to the American people. For example, clinical trials
were conducted with deliberately gave the participants a toxic doses of
hydroxychloroquine and then used their deaths to argue a decades old
drug was suddenly “unsafe” and blared that message (along with other
fabricated data which supported that narrative) throughout the mass
media.
Note: during the pandemic, we reached out to the
Trump administration for help since the (“Warp Speed”) FDA was
stonewalling us, and our contact essentially told us they agreed our
therapy had merit, but given how much the media had turned the public
against them for promoting hydroxychloroquine, they could not take on
the political risk of promoting something less orthodox right before an
election.
In turn, since I’ve actively studied the period
Davidson documented, I can verify his accounts are accurate (e.g., many
of the key figures who blocked America from receiving hydroxychloroquine
later went on to receive lucrative pharmaceutical jobs). Additionally,
because of his media background, he was able to do something I feel is
very important I have not see anyone else do—create montages of everyone
in the media echoing the sculpted language created to sell the COVID
narrative. This is a very common practice (e.g., consider this montage
of “independent” journalists echoing the language a PR firm determined
was the most effective way to promote their client’s message):
Note:
many have suspected that Peter Hotez is working with the pharmaceutical
industry since he always gets softball interviews on mainstream
networks to promote vaccination (which he of course denies). One of the
interesting things I realized from watching Davidson’s montages these
was the Peter Hotez verbatim said the same sculpted pharmaceutical
talking points many others were also repeating.
Overall, what
I find so frustrating about this tactic is how effective it is—the
language crafted through testing it on focus groups is incredibly
effective at influencing individuals who do not have an extensive
background in the subject. In turn, I believe one of the most important
aspects of Davidson’s documentary is he makes this tactic clear to the
viewer, and through doing so, gives them the ability to begin seeing
through it so they can no longer by influenced by it—something I would
argue is pivotal as that approach is how so many audacious lies are sold
to the public, and it is hence guaranteed this approach will be used
for the next pandemic too.
Once
COVID-19 started and I realized the scale of what we were up against
(as trillions were on the line to make sure the disease was never
cured), I accepted that it would likely be impossible to stop the
immense human tragedy we were watching unfold. Nonetheless, I was also
hopeful.
This is because I felt what was being done during
the pandemic was so over the top and so beyond what most of America had
experienced before that it would likely lead to widespread public
outcry, and eventually a complete loss of trust in the people who pushed
this upon us. While this is terrible, the alternative was what we had
already been watching, a continual and sustained increase in corruption
of all our institutions (which amongst other things is what allowed
COVID-19 to happen) and I believe had something extreme as COVID not
been pulled on America in 2020, we instead would have seen something
similar to it anyways 10 years down the road—but unlike now, it would
not have been as stark a contrast to what people were already habituated
to and hence not as widely protested.
Consider for instance that in his final broadcast
before he was fired from Fox News, Tucker Carlson pointed out that the
rest of the Mass Media sold out America by taking money to relentlessly
promote the vaccines even once it was already known they were unsafe and
ineffective. Like many, I suspect a key reason why the media has
refused to report on the wave of vaccine related deaths we are now
seeing is because it would require them to admit their culpability and
they are hence doubling down on their lies.
While
many things can be taken from Tucker’s story, I believe the most
important one was that once he was fired, rather than lose his platform,
Tucker became much more popular and now regularly produces news
segments which get more viewership than the rest of the media combined.
This in turn illustrates the situation all of the establishment is
in—they’ve lied so much that when people speak the truth, many are now
willing to listen. That in short is why documentaries like Davidson’s are so important right now.
Note: Davidson (who can also be followed on Twitter) is now fundraising to make a followup documentary about the vast online censorship apparatus we spent the last week working to expose.
If
you are able to watch it, please let me know what you think of in the
comments (e.g., my main critique is that since there is only so much you
can cover in two hours, it didn’t go into the horrendous War on Ivermectin, or exactly what transpired
within the Whitehouse’s COVID-19 task force where individuals like
Deborah Birx and Anthony Fauci did everything they could to destroy
America for the vaccine industry).
I thank each of you for
the support you have given this publication which has made my work
possible, and more importantly for everything you’ve done to help shift
the insurmountable needle on this issue and begin waking up the public
to exactly what has happened and that we all need to come together to do
it fix this.
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire